See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

5 Pfennig - Auerbach Fritz Burger

Issuer Fritz Burger, Auerbach in der Oberpfalz
Year
Type Log in to see details
Value 5 Pfennigs (5 Pfennige) (0.05)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Outer pearl border follows the octagonal flan, enclosing a circular beaded ring. Within the beaded ring, the large numeral '5' occupies the central field. The peripheral legend between the outer pearl border and the beaded circle reads 'FRITZ BURGER' across the upper arc and 'AUERBACH' across the lower arc, each separated by a single five-pointed star at the lateral positions.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering FRITZ BURGER 5 ★ AUERBACH ★
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Fritz Burger's Auerbach notgeld belongs to the extraordinary flood of locally-issued emergency coinage that swept Germany between 1916 and 1921, driven by wartime metal shortages that made even small-denomination Reichsmark coins vanish from circulation as hoarded raw material. Municipal authorities, private businesses, and individual merchants were left to fill the gap themselves. Zinc was the practical choice — cheap, available, and already familiar to the military procurement machine consuming copper and nickel by the ton.

The Menzel reference numbers suggest this type was catalogued in both the 2005 and 2018 editions, indicating it has been consistently recognized rather than reclassified — a small sign of relative type stability in a field notoriously riddled with attribution disputes.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE