See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

5 Mark

Issuer Stadt Meißen (City of Meißen)
Year 1918
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Mark (1914-1924)
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description The face of this municipal Notgeld issue carries the denomination '5 Mark' in bold letterpress type, set within typographic border ornaments characteristic of German wartime emergency currency. The issuing authority 'Meißen' is inscribed as the municipal issuer, accompanied by the date and official text in Gothic blackletter script. The layout is utilitarian, with minimal vignette ornamentation against a plain ground, consistent with locally produced wartime issues of the 1914–1918 period.
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Watermark
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Meißen's municipal notgeld emerged from the same wartime metal shortage that forced hundreds of German towns to print emergency paper in denominations normally reserved for coins. The Stadt Meißen issue sits in a well-documented category, but Meißen carries a specific irony: a city globally synonymous with fine porcelain was reduced to circulating paper scrip because the empire had requisitioned its metal for the war effort.

The watermark is worth noting — most municipal notgeld of this period dispensed with security features entirely, printing on whatever paper stock was available. Its presence here suggests the city either had access to quality stock or was making a deliberate gesture toward legitimacy at a moment when public trust in emergency currency was already fraying badly.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE