目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面铭文 | 大明寶鈔 肆佰文 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 签名 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪描述 | Vermilion hand-applied official seal impression serving as the principal authentication and anti-counterfeiting device |
| 变体 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 备注 |
The Da-Ming Baochao series, introduced under the Hongwu Emperor in 1375, was backed by nothing except imperial decree — there was no silver or copper reserve, and no redemption mechanism was ever seriously implemented. The government also banned the use of copper cash and silver for private transactions in the same period, an attempt to force public adoption that generated widespread evasion rather than confidence.
Mulberry bark paper was specified precisely because it was difficult to source outside official channels, an early anti-counterfeiting measure that worked better in theory than in practice. Forgery was punishable by death, with rewards offered to informants — including the forger's own neighbors.
By the mid-fifteenth century the notes had lost most of their face value through chronic overissue, and the Ming government quietly stopped defending the currency altogether.