See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

300 Gulden

Issuer De Nederlandsche Bank
Year 1814-1854
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size 200 × 87 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering NEDERLANDSCHE BANK. Ontvangen van Toonder de Somma van Drie Honderd Guldens / om aan Toonder, op vertooning te restituëren. Amsterdam, den 9 Januarÿ 1854. Nederlandsche-Bank President - Directeur - Secretaris III. Drie Honderd Guldens.
(Translation: Bank of Netherlands. Received from Bearer the Sum of Three Hundred Guilders, to be returned to Bearer upon presentation. Amsterdam, the 9th January 1854. Bank of Netherlands. President - Director - Secretary Three Hundred Gulden)
Reverse description The reverse is unprinted, with plain paper stock showing through-bleed of the red letterpress text from the obverse; a large star-shaped cancellation punch is visible at the right side, as was customary when notes were redeemed or cancelled.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

De Nederlandsche Bank was established by royal decree in 1814, and the 300 Gulden denomination was among the highest values in its early note series — a face value that put it well beyond the reach of ordinary commerce and into the hands of merchants, financiers, and government treasuries. The denomination itself was abolished as the bank rationalized its note ladder across the mid-nineteenth century, making this a relatively short-lived instrument in institutional terms.

Enschedé in Haarlem had been printing for the Dutch state since the eighteenth century, and their involvement here is unsurprising. What is worth noting is the forty-year production window: dating individual notes precisely within the 1814–1854 span requires close attention to signature combinations and manuscript date entries.