Catalog
| Issuer | Alaisa Archonidea |
|---|---|
| Year | 344 BC - 338 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Litra |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 31.47 g |
| Diameter | 30 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | Campana#3, CNS#12, HGC 2#183 |
| Obverse description | Wreathed head of Sikelia to right. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Torch between two grain ears. |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | ΣYMMAXIKON |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (344 BC - 338 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 2259500340 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: Issued by Alaisa Archonidea between 344 and 338 BC, this Æ 30 bronze coin signifies a robust local currency during a dynamic period in the Greek world. The late Classical era, marked by shifting hegemonies, saw the rise of powerful regional entities. The substantial bronze denomination (31.47g, 30mm) underscores Alaisa Archonidea's economic autonomy and the necessity for vigorous internal trade coinage, suggesting a prosperous or strategically important locale capable of minting heavy fiduciary issues.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, the Æ 30 reflects the refined aesthetics of the late Classical Greek stylistic school, celebrated for naturalistic rendering and sculptural quality. Typically, such heavy bronzes feature a commanding obverse design, perhaps a laureate head of a local patron deity or nymph, rendered with intricate detail. The reverse would likely display a civic emblem, mythological creature, or agricultural symbol pertinent to Alaisa Archonidea's identity, executed with realism and symbolic power characteristic of the period's finest numismatic art.
Technical/Grading: This Æ 30, weighing 31.47 grams and measuring 30mm, is a substantial bronze issue. Key high-points, such as hair curls, facial features of an obverse deity, or reverse animal musculature, are critical for assessing wear. The large flan often allowed for a full, though sometimes off-center, strike. Quality is paramount, with well-preserved examples exhibiting sharp details, good metal flow, and minimal die wear. Bronze composition ensures durability, but surface patination and corrosion are common grading considerations.