Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

25 Kreuzers Miskolc

Uitgever Miskolcz városa hatósága (Municipality of Miskolc)
Jaar 1860
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde 25 Krajcár (0.25)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde The note is framed by a fine typographic border of repeated decorative elements. The central text, set in a combination of larger and smaller letterpress typefaces, states the municipal treasury voucher title, the denomination in words and numerals, and the conditions of redemption, with the issuing authority and date printed at lower right. A manuscript serial number appears at upper right, and a blue official stamp of the municipality of Miskolc is visible at lower left. The printer's imprint reads 'Misk. nyomt. Rácz Á.' at the bottom margin.
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Blue circular official stamp of the Municipality of Miskolc applied at lower left on both sides
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

Municipal fractional notes of this kind proliferated across Hungary in the early 1860s as small-denomination coinage effectively vanished from circulation — hoarded by a public rattled by the economic disruptions following the 1848–49 revolution and subsequent Austrian fiscal policy. Miskolc was among the northern Hungarian market towns that took the practical step of authorizing local scrip rather than letting retail commerce seize up entirely.

Printed by the local firm Rácz Á. rather than any specialist security printer, the note's authentication relied entirely on its official municipal stamp — a fragile arrangement that made forgery relatively straightforward and redemption politically complicated once central authority reasserted itself.