Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

25 Francs - Léopold I Reeded Edge

Uitgever Belgium
Jaar 1848-1850
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Bare-headed effigy of King Leopold I facing right, rendered in high relief with fine portrait detail typical of mid-19th century Belgian coinage. The king's name and title appear as a continuous legend surrounding the portrait: LEOPOLD PREMIER ROI DES BELGES. The engraver's signature L. WIENER appears below the truncation of the bust. The field is smooth, with the legend in raised Roman capitals.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde LEOPOLD PREMIER ROI DES BELGES L WIENER
(Translation: Leopold I, King of the Belgians)
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Belgium's earliest gold coinage was a deliberate political statement issued by a kingdom that had only existed since 1831. The 25-franc denomination linked the new nation directly to the French monetary tradition, adopting specifications nearly identical to the French 20-franc piece scaled upward — a calculated alignment with the Latin world's dominant gold standard before the Latin Monetary Union was formally codified.

The three KM references reflect die variety distinctions documented across the three-year run. Delmonte remains the authoritative source for separating them, and misattribution between the sub-types is routine in general auction catalogs.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT