Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Württemberg, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1622 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Thaler (1495-1802) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A crowned, ornate oval coat of arms of the Duchy of Württemberg, displayed within an elaborate baroque cartouche with scrollwork and foliate ornaments. The quartered shield bears the distinctive Württemberg arms including the three stag antlers. The surrounding circular Latin legend reads ·15·MONT·DOM·IN·HEIDENHEM, referencing the lord of Heidenheim title. The overall composition is characteristic of early seventeenth-century German heraldic engraving. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Produced at the height of the Kipper- und Wipperzeit — the currency debasement crisis that swept the Holy Roman Empire between roughly 1618 and 1623 — this piece belongs to one of the most chaotic monetary episodes in German history. Territorial mints raced to produce debased coinage, meeting the letter of face value while gutting silver content, then spending the proceeds before neighboring states caught on. Württemberg was among the more aggressive participants.
The "Kipper" designation in the name is not decorative — it is a direct admission of the coin's origin in that crisis.