Katalog
| İhraççı | Corinth |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 10 BC - 4 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | |
| Para birimi | |
| Bileşim | Bronze (leaded) |
| Ağırlık | 6.5 g |
| Çap | 22 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | RPC Online I#1134, BMC Greek#503 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Bare head of Augustus facing right. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | Latin |
| Ön yüz lejandı | M ANT HIPPARC M NOVIO BASSO |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Inscription in five lines within wreath. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Latin |
| Arka yüz lejandı | II · VIR CORINT |
| Kenar | Plain |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (10 BC - 4 BC) - `M ANT HIPPARC` left of the portrait; `M NOVIO BASSO` right of the portrait - ND (10 BC - 4 BC) - `M ANT HIPPARC` right of the portrait; `M NOVIO BASSO` left of the portrait - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 5787331070 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Æ22 bronze coin, issued by the Roman colony of Corinth between 10 BC and 4 BC, falls within the mature reign of Augustus Caesar. During this period, Augustus consolidated imperial authority, establishing the Pax Romana. Corinth, refounded as a Roman colony by Julius Caesar, served as a crucial administrative and economic hub in Greece. Its colonial coinage, featuring the emperor, underscored imperial presence and local loyalty, facilitating commerce within the colony and its environs.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for provincial issues, the coin reflects the prevailing Augustan artistic style adapted for colonial production. The obverse likely features a laureate portrait of Augustus, rendered to convey imperial gravitas. The reverse design would typically incorporate a local Corinthian motif, such as Pegasos or a representation of Acrocorinth, or a symbol referencing Roman colonial status, blending local identity with imperial iconography.
Technical/Grading: Struck in leaded bronze, this Æ22 piece often exhibits characteristics common to provincial issues. High-points on the obverse, such as the laurel wreath, nose, and ear of Augustus, are frequently susceptible to wear or weakness of strike. The reverse motif's details are also vulnerable. Technical strike qualities vary, with examples showing off-centering, planchet irregularities, and die wear. The leaded bronze composition might contribute to a softer strike or specific patination characteristics.