کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Thessaloniki |
|---|---|
| سال | 187 BC - 31 BC |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | |
| واحد پول | Drachm |
| ترکیب | Bronze |
| وزن | 6.7 g |
| قطر | 22 mm |
| ضخامت | 2.5 mm |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | SNG ANS 7#801-2, AMNG III#16 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Head of Zeus, right |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Eagle with wings spread, head right, standing on lightning bolts. |
| خط پشت سکه | Greek |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه |
ΘEΣΣAΛONIKHΣ (Translation: Thessaloniki) |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (187 BC - 31 BC) - - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 9082577470 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This Æ22 bronze coin was issued by the city of Thessaloniki during a protracted and pivotal period spanning 187 BC to 31 BC. Following the Roman conquest of Macedon in 168 BC, Thessaloniki, a crucial port and administrative center, was granted the esteemed status of a free city (civitas libera). This autonomy permitted the continued issuance of its own coinage, reflecting its enduring economic and cultural significance. The extensive timeframe of this series underscores Thessaloniki's stability and importance as it navigated the late Hellenistic world and the tumultuous final decades of the Roman Republic, gradually integrating into the Roman provincial system.
Artistry: The artistry of this Æ22 aligns with the Hellenistic Greek stylistic school prevalent in municipal issues of the era. While individual engravers remain largely anonymous for such bronze coinage, the designs typically adhered to established iconographic conventions. Obverses frequently featured the head of a prominent deity, such as Poseidon or Zeus, or a personification of the city (Tyche). Reverses commonly depicted civic symbols like a ship's prow, a cult statue, or other emblems reflecting the city's identity and prosperity, executed with a robust aesthetic appropriate for the bronze medium.
Technical/Grading: For optimal technical assessment and grading, key high-points on this Æ22 would include the hair and facial features of any obverse bust, and the most prominent elements of the reverse motif, such as drapery or specific attributes. A superior example would exhibit a strong, centered strike, ensuring full detail on both sides and a well-formed flan. The presence of an even, attractive patination, free from significant corrosion, pitting, or aggressive cleaning marks, is also paramount for evaluating the coin's preservation and overall numismatic appeal.