Katalog
| İhraççı | Malaka |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 200 BC - 100 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | |
| Para birimi | Unit (2nd century BC) |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 11 g |
| Çap | 22 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | FAB#1727, ACIP#786, GCV#50, Heiss#1 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Head of Chusor-Ptah (Hephaistos) right, wearing pointed cap, tongs behind |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Radiate head of Sol facing. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (200 BC - 100 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 3325771010 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Æ22 from Malaka, struck between 200 and 100 BC, marks a pivotal era in Iberian history. As a prominent Phoenician port, Malaka navigated the transition from Carthaginian influence to growing Roman hegemony following the Second Punic War. The issuance of this local bronze coinage highlights the city's ongoing economic vitality and its need for internal currency to facilitate daily commerce, reflecting municipal autonomy amidst significant geopolitical shifts.
Artistry: This Æ22 typically features a robust obverse bust, likely depicting the tutelary deity Melqart, often syncretized with Hercules, rendered in a Hellenistic-influenced Punic-Iberian style. The reverse commonly displays an emblem pertinent to Malaka’s maritime identity, such as a tuna fish, accompanied by a Punic legend. Anonymous engravers of this period blended indigenous Iberian elements with Carthaginian and nascent Roman artistic conventions, forging a distinctive local numismatic aesthetic.
Technical/Grading: Struck on an 11-gram bronze flan, the Æ22 generally exhibits a competent, though often variable, strike quality. High-points for wear include the deity's hair and facial features on the obverse, and the tuna's fins and scales on the reverse. Characteristic technical observations for these issues often include minor flan irregularities and occasional slight off-centering, which are typical of ancient bronze production. Well-centered examples with sharp relief are highly prized.