See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

200 Pesos Uruguayos Millennium

Issuer Banco Central del Uruguay
Year 1999
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Miguel Battegazzore
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse presents a richly detailed Constructivist composition in the tradition of Joaquín Torres García, with a stylized sun at center surrounded by the four symbols of the national coat of arms. An outer register contains a variety of symbolic motifs arranged around the circumference, including a Greek temple, the moon, a stepped pyramid, a bell, a thistle flower, a telecommunications tower, the Universal Man figure, the Golden Section rule, a triangle, a heart, and a fish. The date 1999 appears as the sole legend in the field. The overall design evokes mankind's universal connection to the cosmos through the visual language of Universal Constructivism.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Lettered
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Issued to mark the turn of the millennium, this piece was authorized under Uruguay's Law 17.243, which also covered a broader package of economic reforms passed in the final years of the Batlle government. The Banco Central struck a limited commemorative series through this period, though precise mintage figures for this issue remain inconsistently documented across major references — KM and SA attributions diverge on production totals.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE