Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
20 Soles = 25 Pesos
| Issuer | La Providencia - Sociedad General del Perú |
|---|---|
| Year | 1864 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Sol (1863-1985) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | LA PROVIDENCIA SOCIEDAD GENERAL DEL PERÚ LA ADMINISTRACION GENERAL pagará a la vista VEINTE SOLES al portador Ó SEA VEINTE Y CINCO PESOS Moneda corriente. 1864 el 30 de Junio, Lima 30 de Junio 1864 El Tesorero El Presidente El Director General L.A.A. 5250 |
| Reverse description | No second image provided; the reverse description cannot be established from catalog sources with certainty. |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
La Providencia was one of several Peruvian private banks that briefly issued fiduciary currency in the early 1860s before tighter state banking controls curtailed the practice. This denomination — expressed as a dual valuation bridging soles and pesos — reflects the transitional monetary arithmetic of 1864, when Peru was still working through the practical consequences of the 1863 decimal reform that replaced the peso with the sol at a rate of 5 soles to 4 pesos.
Printing in Lima rather than abroad was unusual for private Peruvian bank issues of this period, most of which were contracted to European firms. That domestic production likely contributed to the vulnerability of these notes to forgery, a persistent complaint among Lima merchants in contemporary press accounts.