Katalog
| Emitent | Alabanda |
|---|---|
| Rok | 168 BC - 31 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 5.32 g |
| Średnica | 20.0 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | SNG Munich 22#28, HN Online#1502 |
| Opis awersu | Head of Artemis facing right, wearing a lotus blossom in her hair and with a quiver behind |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Pegasus flying right with the names of two magistrates below and all within wreath |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu | ΑΛΑΒΑΝΔΕωΝ ΔΑΜΑ ΙΑΤΡΟ |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (168 BC - 31 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 9121436080 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Æ20 bronze coin was issued by Alabanda in Caria, spanning the late Hellenistic period from 168 BC to 31 BC. Post-Treaty of Apamea, Alabanda enjoyed significant autonomy and prosperity under increasing Roman influence. This broad date range covers its free city status through integration into the Roman provincial system after Actium. These civic bronzes were crucial for local commerce, reflecting the city's economic vitality and self-governance during a transformative era.
Artistry: While the engraver is anonymous, this coin exemplifies the Hellenistic stylistic school prevalent in Asia Minor. Alabandan coinage frequently features local deities, notably Apollo, the city's patron god, often rendered with idealized form and naturalistic detail. The design typically showcases a prominent divine bust on the obverse, characterized by refined features, complemented by a symbolic reverse motif pertinent to the city's identity or cults, such as a lyre or torch.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan weighing 5.32 grams with a diameter of 20.0 millimeters, this coin's technical execution is typical for civic bronzes of the period. High-points for wear and strike quality include the hair and facial features of the obverse deity, and central elements of the reverse device. The fabric often exhibits minor flan irregularities or slight off-centering, common for ancient bronze production. A well-struck example shows a clear, legible design with minimal die wear, preserving intricate details.