Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein (City of Ludwigshafen am Rhein) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1923 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Paper |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein ZWANZIG MILLIONEN MARK GUTSCHEIN ÜBER ZWANZIG MILLIONEN MARK DER STADT LUDWIGSHAFEN LUDWIGSHAFEN A.RHEIN 31.AUG.1923 * DER OBERBÜRGERMSTR: Dieser Gutschein wird spätestens zum 1.Januar 1924 zur Einlösung aufgerufen. |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | ZWANZIG·MILLIONEN·MARK |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Ludwigshafen's municipal administration — like hundreds of German city governments in 1923 — was forced into the business of emergency currency issuance simply because the Reichsbank could not print fast enough to keep pace with hyperinflation. By August of that year, a 20-million Mark denomination was barely sufficient for basic transactions; many of these Notgeld issues were rendered functionally obsolete within weeks of printing.
The printer here, Weiss & Hameier, was a local Ludwigshafen firm — genuinely local production, not a job farmed out to one of the major specialty printers like Giesecke & Devrient. The facsimile signature attributed to Bürgermeister Weiss raises the obvious question of whether the signatory shared a name with the printing house, though no documented connection has been established.