Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Java (Indonesian States) |
|---|---|
| Năm | 1818-1819 |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | 2 Stuivers (1⁄15) |
| Tiền tệ | Rupee (1744-1818) |
| Chất liệu | Copper |
| Trọng lượng | 29.14 g |
| Đường kính | |
| Độ dày | 9 mm |
| Hình dạng | Rectangular (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | Coin alignment ↑↓ |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | KM#236 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Denomination/Value |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | Latin |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | 2 St |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Date |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | Latin |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | 1818 |
| Cạnh | Rough metal scrap |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
1818 - - 1819 - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1216035500 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This 2 Stuivers copper coin from Java, dated 1818-1819, signifies the re-establishment of Dutch authority in the East Indies after the British interregnum (1811-1816). King Willem I, reigning from 1815, directly governed these territories following the Dutch East India Company's dissolution. This coinage was vital for local commerce and economic stabilization during the early consolidation of direct Dutch colonial rule, reflecting a transformative period for Java after significant political and administrative shifts.
Artistry: As a hammered coinage, this 2 Stuivers issue prioritizes utility over artistic sophistication. No specific engraver is known; the stylistic school is best described as rudimentary colonial functionality. The design typically presents a simple monogram, likely King Willem I's, on the obverse, with the denomination and date on the reverse. Execution is often crude, resulting in irregular planchets and coarse details, indicative of the limited minting technology available in the Dutch East Indies during this immediate post-restoration era.
Technical/Grading: The hammered production method ensures the technical strike quality of this 2 Stuivers coin is highly variable. Collectors should anticipate irregular planchets, frequent off-center strikes, and significant areas of weakness. High points, like the monogram's central elements or the denomination and date numerals, are often poorly defined or partially struck. Well-centered examples with strong, even strikes across the entire design are rare, representing premium specimens within the series given the inherent manufacturing challenges.