See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

2 Roubles Revenue Stamp - Type 1

Issuer Chita Branch of the State Bank
Year 1918
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size 110 × 90 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering (Note) ЧИТИНСКОЕ ОТДЕЛѢНИЕ Государственнаго Банка. Имѣетъ хожденіе наравнѣ съ кредитными билетами в предѣлахъ Забайкальской области. (Paper Stamp) Гербовая марки 2 рубля 2 (Ink stamp) Читинское Отделение Государственного Банка
(Translation: (Note) CHITA BRANCH OF THE STATE BANK. Valid for use in the Transbaikal region on a par with banknotes. (Paper Stamp) Revenue Stamp 2 roubles 2 (Ink stamp) Chita Branch of the State Bank)
Reverse description Reverse is blank, without any printed text, vignette, or ornamental element.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Chita served as the administrative center of the Transbaikal region and, during 1918, hosted a rapidly shifting series of authorities — Bolshevik, then anti-Bolshevik, then nominally under Ataman Semenov's brutal and erratic control. The State Bank branch there resorted to overprinting or repurposing existing revenue stamp stock when conventional banknote supply from Petrograd became impossible to guarantee. This was not unique to Chita, but the Transbaikal context made supply disruptions especially acute given the region's isolation and the chaos along the Trans-Siberian Railway.

Revenue stamp coinage substitutes of this type are notoriously difficult to attribute with precision — "Type 1" distinctions often rest on minor typographic differences in the overprint rather than any formal issuing document.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE