Katalog
| İhraççı | Guatemala |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 1663 |
| Tür | Emergency coin |
| Değer | 2 Reales |
| Para birimi | Real (1733-1859) |
| Bileşim | Silver (.931) |
| Ağırlık | 6.7667 g |
| Çap | |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Cob |
| Teknik | Countermarked, Hammered (cob) |
| Yönlendirme | |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | KM#A1 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane |
Lima, Peru (1565-date) Potosi, Bolivia (1572-1953) |
| Basma adedi |
ND (1663) L - KM#A1.1; Host dates 1577-1589 - ND (1663) PR - KM#A1.2; Host dates 1574-1579 - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 1147711980 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: The 1663 2 Reales provisional countermarked coinage from Guatemala dates to King Felipe IV's reign (1621-1665). This era saw significant imperial challenges and economic strain, leading to currency shortages across the Spanish colonial empire. The Captaincy General of Guatemala, facing a scarcity of new royal coinage, employed countermarking as a pragmatic solution. This validated existing or foreign currency, ensuring its legal tender status and maintaining local economic stability.
Artistry: The artistry of this issue primarily resides in the countermark, typically a crowned "F.IV," rather than the host coin. No specific engraver is attributed, as this functional mark was applied locally. Belonging to a utilitarian stylistic school, the design prioritizes clear identification and royal validation over elaborate aesthetics. Its simplicity reflects its purpose: to unequivocally assert the coin's legitimacy under Felipe IV's authority within Guatemalan jurisdiction, transforming an existing piece into official currency.
Technical/Grading: This 2 Reales, weighing 6.7667 grams and .931 silver, presents unique technical considerations. Primary high-points for evaluation are the raised elements of the countermark: the crown and the monarch's initial and regnal number. A strong, well-centered impression is highly desirable. Technical strike qualities vary; countermarks can exhibit uneven pressure, sometimes distorting the host coin. The underlying host coin's details are also assessed, but the countermark's clarity remains paramount.