| Émetteur | Mewar, Princely state of |
|---|---|
| Année | 1760 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | 2 Pies (1⁄96) |
| Devise | Rupee (1760-1943) |
| Composition | Copper |
| Poids | 5 g |
| Diamètre | 16.5 mm |
| Épaisseur | 3.1 mm |
| Forme | Round |
| Technique | |
| Orientation | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | C#2.1 |
| Description de l’avers | Trident |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Large trident |
| Écriture du revers | |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (1760) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1664317050 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This 2 Pies copper coin, dated 1760, originates from Mewar Udaipur during a tumultuous period. The year falls within the reign of Maharana Raj Singh II (1754-1761) or early Maharana Ari Singh II (1761-1773). This era saw significant internal dissent and increasing Maratha incursions, weakening Mewar's autonomy and economic stability. The issuance of low-denomination copper coinage was crucial for local commerce amidst these profound political and economic challenges.
Artistry: The engraver of this 2 Pies coin remains anonymous, typical for base metal issues of the period. Stylistically, it reflects a pragmatic indigenous Rajput aesthetic, incorporating simplified calligraphic elements and symbolic motifs. While influenced by Mughal traditions, the design tended towards utilitarian, localized expression. C#2.1 typically features a rudimentary Nagari legend, often stylized or partially legible, alongside symbolic devices such as a dagger (katar) or sun, characteristic of Mewar's copper coinage.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a copper flan (5 grams, 16.5 millimeters), this 2 Pies coin often exhibits considerable variability in technical execution. High-points for detail retention typically include central symbolic motifs, like the katar, and any discernible legend portions. Common technical strike qualities include irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and uneven pressure, leading to areas of weakness or flatness. Die wear was also prevalent, further impacting design clarity.