| Issuer | Mewar, Princely state of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1760 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 2 Pies (1⁄96) |
| Currency | Rupee (1760-1943) |
| Composition | Copper |
| Weight | 5 g |
| Diameter | 16.5 mm |
| Thickness | 3.1 mm |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | C#2.1 |
| Obverse description | Trident |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Large trident |
| Reverse script | |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (1760) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1664317050 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This 2 Pies copper coin, dated 1760, originates from Mewar Udaipur during a tumultuous period. The year falls within the reign of Maharana Raj Singh II (1754-1761) or early Maharana Ari Singh II (1761-1773). This era saw significant internal dissent and increasing Maratha incursions, weakening Mewar's autonomy and economic stability. The issuance of low-denomination copper coinage was crucial for local commerce amidst these profound political and economic challenges.
Artistry: The engraver of this 2 Pies coin remains anonymous, typical for base metal issues of the period. Stylistically, it reflects a pragmatic indigenous Rajput aesthetic, incorporating simplified calligraphic elements and symbolic motifs. While influenced by Mughal traditions, the design tended towards utilitarian, localized expression. C#2.1 typically features a rudimentary Nagari legend, often stylized or partially legible, alongside symbolic devices such as a dagger (katar) or sun, characteristic of Mewar's copper coinage.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a copper flan (5 grams, 16.5 millimeters), this 2 Pies coin often exhibits considerable variability in technical execution. High-points for detail retention typically include central symbolic motifs, like the katar, and any discernible legend portions. Common technical strike qualities include irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and uneven pressure, leading to areas of weakness or flatness. Die wear was also prevalent, further impacting design clarity.