See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

2 Macuta - Pedro V Countermark CROWNED SHIELD over '1 Macuta, João Prince'

Issuer Angola
Year 1853
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Obverse of the host coin (KM#46, 1 Macuta of João, Prince Regent), featuring a circular beaded border enclosing the legend JOANNES·D·G·PORT·P·REGENSE·D·GUINEÆ· distributed around the periphery in Latin script. The field is plain, with no central effigy. Applied at center is the crowned shield countermark of Pedro V, struck in 1853 per the Edict of March 1 of that year, consisting of a crowned Portuguese coat of arms in relief, doubling the face value of the host coin from 1 to 2 Macutas. The countermark is clearly defined against the copper field.
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

When Portugal's treasury lacked the resources to mint fresh colonial coinage for Angola in 1853, the practical solution was to counterstamp existing 1 Macuta pieces from the reign of João, Prince Regent, doubling their face value by crowned shield punch rather than new production. The countermark simultaneously retired the old denomination and introduced Pedro V's authority to a colony that had been circulating the same copper for decades.

The punching operation was notoriously inconsistent — placement varies widely across surviving examples, with many strikes landing off-center or partially on the coin's edge.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE