Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

2 Keping Aceh

Uitgever Sultanate of Aceh
Jaar 1832-1836
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde 2 Kepings (1/200)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Central field displays a three-element Arabic inscription arranged vertically: the denomination numeral '٢' (two) at the top, the words 'دو كڤڠ' (two kepings) in the middle, and the Hijri date '١٢۴٧' (AH 1247, corresponding to 1832 CE) in Eastern Arabic numerals at the bottom. The legends are rendered in raised relief within a plain field, encircled by a border of fine beads. The layout is typical of Acehnese copper keping coinage of the early nineteenth century.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde ٢ دو كڤڠ ١٢۴۷
(Translation: Two kepings AH 1247)
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The Sultanate of Aceh maintained a tin-based monetary system for centuries, but periodic shortages forced irregular copper issues — this keping being among them. The 1832–1836 window corresponds to the reign of Sultan Muhammad Syah, a period of sustained commercial friction with the Dutch, who were actively pressuring Acehnese ports and disrupting the pepper trade that had long underpinned the sultanate's economy.

The multiple catalog references reflect genuine scholarly disagreement about attribution and sequence within this series rather than simple cross-listing.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT