Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Republic of China |
|---|---|
| Year | 1929 |
| Type | Coin pattern |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Left-facing truncated bust of Sun Yat-sen in civilian attire with a mandarin collar, rendered in high relief with fine portrait detailing. A six-character Chinese legend arcs across the upper field, reading 中華民國十八年 (Year 18 of the Republic of China). The legend is distributed across the upper portion of the field in a semi-circular arrangement flanking the bust. The rim is bordered by a continuous beaded inner border. The overall style reflects the refined engraving work associated with the proposed Junk dollar pattern series of 1929. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Chinese |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The "Junk dollar" pattern series of 1929 emerged from the Republic of China's sustained effort to unify a chaotic national currency — dozens of provincial mints were still striking their own silver, and Beijing had been pushing for a standardized national coinage since at least 1914. The junk design was among several competing proposals evaluated that year, none of which advanced to full production. Kann's documentation of multiple sub-varieties within this type reflects genuine die differences across the surviving pattern population, not simply cataloging convention.
L&M#99 places this among the rarest of the 1929 pattern submissions.