2 Dollars

Emittente	Treasury of Liberia
Anno	1876-1880
Tipo	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Valore	2 Dollars
Valuta	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Composizione	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Dimensioni	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Forma	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Stampatore	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Disegnatore/i	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Incisore/i	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
In circolazione fino al	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Riferimento/i	Accedi per vedere i dettagli

Descrizione del dritto	At upper centre, a vignette of a sailing ship at sea with a palm tree to the right, framed by an arc bearing the title "REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA" flanked by the notations "RECEIVABLE" and "FOR DUTIES". The denomination "TWO DOLLARS" appears in vertical letterpress panels on both left and right margins. The body of the note carries a handwritten promise-to-pay text, a manuscript date referencing Monrovia, a serial number in the upper left, and two manuscript signatures with their respective titles below.
Legenda del dritto	REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA RECEIVABLE FOR DUTIES ON DEMAND AT THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT THE TREASURER OF THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA WILL PAY TO BEARER TWO DOLLARS TWO DOLLARS
Descrizione del rovescio	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Legenda del rovescio	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Firma/e	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Tipo di protezione	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Descrizione della protezione	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Varianti	Accedi per vedere i dettagli
Commenti	Liberia's Treasury notes of this period occupy an odd position in West African monetary history. The republic had been issuing paper currency since the 1850s, but chronic underfunding and the absence of a central bank meant these notes depended entirely on government credibility — which fluctuated badly. By the late 1870s, Liberia's finances were under serious strain from debt obligations tied to an 1871 London loan that had been catastrophically mismanaged, leaving the Treasury in no position to guarantee redemption with any confidence. Surviving examples from this series are genuinely scarce, almost certainly because circulation volumes were low and public trust in paper lower still.