Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Imperial China (Ming Dynasty) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1621-1627 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Cast |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Chinese (traditional, regular script) |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Jiangning (Nanjing) Mint, modern-day Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (circa 1361-1670) Ministry of Public Works Mint, New Branch (工部局), Nanjing, China (1599-1644) Ministry of Public Works Mint (工部局), Beijing, China (1361-1726) Ministry of Public Works Mint (工部局), Nanjing, China (1361-1726) Ministry of Revenue Mint, New Branch (戶部局), Nanjing, China (circa 1623) Ministry of Revenue Mint (戶部局), Beijing, China (1622-1727) Ministry of Revenue Mint (戶部局), Nanjing, China (1599-1644) Miyun Garrison Mint, modern-day Miyun District, Beijing, China (1625-1648) Xuanfu Garrison Mint, modern-day Xuanhua District, Hebei, China (circa 1625-1644) Yunnan Provincial Mint, China Zhejiang Provincial Mint, China Zhili Garrison Mints, modern-day Hebei-Beijing-Tianjin, China |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Tianqi Emperor's reign was administratively dominated by the eunuch Wei Zhongxian, whose faction controlled court finances and, by extension, the imperial mints. Cash production during this period was notoriously inconsistent — alloy quality fluctuated sharply depending on which foundry held current favor. The dot variety on this 2-cash piece is a positional marker distinguishing it from the standard issue, and Hartill documents it separately precisely because such variants were not accidental; dot placement served as a mint or batch identifier within a system that was already struggling to maintain output standards.