| Emittente | Carthage |
|---|---|
| Anno | 400 BC - 350 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valore | |
| Valuta | Shekel |
| Composizione | Bronze |
| Peso | 2.9 g |
| Diametro | 16 mm |
| Spessore | 1 mm |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Tecnica | Hammered |
| Orientamento | Coin alignment ↑↓ |
| Incisore/i | |
| In circolazione fino al | |
| Riferimento/i | GCV#6444, MAA#18, SNG Copenhagen#109, Müller SBZ#168 |
| Descrizione del dritto | Traditional Tanit head left, wreathed in corn |
|---|---|
| Scrittura del dritto | |
| Legenda del dritto | |
| Descrizione del rovescio | Horse standing right, palm behind. |
| Scrittura del rovescio | |
| Legenda del rovescio | |
| Bordo | Rough |
| Zecca | |
| Tiratura |
ND (400 BC - 350 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1237948110 |
| Informazioni aggiuntive |
Historical Context: This Æ16 bronze coin was struck by Carthage between 400 and 350 BC. During this era, Carthage, governed by an aristocratic republic, was deeply engaged in the Sicilian Wars against Greek city-states. The issuance of small denomination bronze coinage was vital for facilitating daily commerce, paying mercenary forces, and supporting the logistical demands of a burgeoning maritime empire, reflecting Carthage's economic prowess and strategic expansion.
Artistry: Lacking specific engraver attribution, common for utilitarian bronzes, the coin's design adhered to prevailing Carthaginian numismatic tradition. This style blended indigenous Punic iconography with Hellenistic influences, reflecting Carthage's extensive Greek interactions, especially in Sicily. Given the small flan, designs typically featured essential symbols like a horse, palm tree, or a deity's head, executed with a robust, functional aesthetic, prioritizing legibility and mass production.
Technical/Grading: As a small bronze issue, the strike quality of this Æ16 varies considerably. High points, such as a horse's mane or facial features, are often weak due to the striking process and flan preparation. Corrosion and surface irregularities are common. A well-centered strike with clear details, especially on any central motif, would be exceptional, given its utilitarian nature and minting limitations.