Catalogo
| Emittente | Alabanda |
|---|---|
| Anno | 197 BC - 188 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valore | |
| Valuta | Drachm |
| Composizione | Bronze |
| Peso | 4.38 g |
| Diametro | 16.0 mm |
| Spessore | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Tecnica | Hammered |
| Orientamento | |
| Incisore/i | |
| In circolazione fino al | |
| Riferimento/i | SNG von Aulock#2384 |
| Descrizione del dritto | Laureate head of Apollo facing right |
|---|---|
| Scrittura del dritto | |
| Legenda del dritto | |
| Descrizione del rovescio | Pegasus flying right, a cadaeus below and with the name of the city above and the name of the magistrate below |
| Scrittura del rovescio | Greek |
| Legenda del rovescio | ΑΝΤΙΟΧΕΙΩΝ ΙΣΟΚΡΑΤΗΣ |
| Bordo | |
| Zecca | |
| Tiratura |
ND (197 BC - 188 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1593370460 |
| Informazioni aggiuntive |
Historical Context: This Æ16 coin from Alabanda, minted between 197 BC and 188 BC, places it firmly within the tumultuous Hellenistic period in Asia Minor. Following the Roman victory at Cynoscephalae and preceding the Treaty of Apamea, Alabanda, a significant Carian city, navigated shifting regional hegemonies. The issuance of local bronze coinage underscores Alabanda's continued civic autonomy and robust local economy, essential for daily transactions during an era of significant political realignment.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for civic bronzes of this era, the coin exemplifies the Hellenistic stylistic school. Hellenistic coinage, even on smaller denominations, often displays a characteristic blend of idealism and naturalism. Common Alabandan types feature prominent deities like Apollo or Zeus on the obverse, rendered with dignified classical features. The reverse typically depicts civic symbols such as Pegasus or an eagle, executed with a dynamic yet refined aesthetic, conveying the city's cultural identity.
Technical/Grading: This Æ16, weighing 4.38 grams and measuring 16.0 mm, represents a common bronze denomination. High-points for wear would typically include the raised features of any portraiture, such as hair or facial contours, and the musculature or wings of any animal device. Technically, bronze issues of this period often exhibit variability in strike quality. Factors like off-centering, minor flan imperfections, and areas of weaker strike due to die wear are common. A well-centered, evenly struck example with strong detail would be considered exceptional for the type.