Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

15 Kopecks

Uitgever Russian Empire Treasury
Jaar 1915
Type Standard circulation banknote
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde ПОЧТА
Николай II
15 КОП 15 КОП
(Translation: MAIL / Nicholas II / 15 KOP 15 KOP)
Beschrijving keerzijde The reverse is printed in black on plain light pink paper within a double-rule rectangular border. At the top centre sits a small typeset Imperial double-headed eagle. Below, a multi-line Cyrillic text in a large serif typeface states that the note circulates on a par with silver subsidiary coinage, occupying the lower two-thirds of the field.
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

Russia's Treasury notes of 1915 filled a gap left by the near-total disappearance of silver coinage from circulation — the public was hoarding coin as the war drained the economy and public confidence collapsed simultaneously. These small-denomination paper pieces effectively replaced the coins, which is why they were printed in coin-sized formats. The State Duma had authorised the suspension of the 1897 gold standard in late July 1914, and by mid-1915 the monetary system was visibly fracturing.

The printed date in the metadata — 30 April 1945 — is certainly a cataloguing error rather than a press date. No credible production record places this issue anywhere near that year.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT