Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Russian Empire Treasury |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1915 |
| Type | Standard circulation banknote |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | ПОЧТА Николай II 15 КОП 15 КОП (Translation: MAIL / Nicholas II / 15 KOP 15 KOP) |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | The reverse is printed in black on plain light pink paper within a double-rule rectangular border. At the top centre sits a small typeset Imperial double-headed eagle. Below, a multi-line Cyrillic text in a large serif typeface states that the note circulates on a par with silver subsidiary coinage, occupying the lower two-thirds of the field. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Russia's Treasury notes of 1915 filled a gap left by the near-total disappearance of silver coinage from circulation — the public was hoarding coin as the war drained the economy and public confidence collapsed simultaneously. These small-denomination paper pieces effectively replaced the coins, which is why they were printed in coin-sized formats. The State Duma had authorised the suspension of the 1897 gold standard in late July 1914, and by mid-1915 the monetary system was visibly fracturing.
The printed date in the metadata — 30 April 1945 — is certainly a cataloguing error rather than a press date. No credible production record places this issue anywhere near that year.