Catálogo
| Emisor | Lysimacheia |
|---|---|
| Año | 225 BC - 198 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | |
| Moneda | Drachm |
| Composición | Bronze |
| Peso | 2.16 g |
| Diámetro | 15 mm |
| Grosor | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | Hammered |
| Orientación | |
| Grabador(es) | |
| En circulación hasta | |
| Referencia(s) | SNG Copenhagen#918, HGC 3.2#1502 |
| Descripción del anverso | Lion head facing right. |
|---|---|
| Escritura del anverso | |
| Leyenda del anverso | |
| Descripción del reverso | Barley ear. |
| Escritura del reverso | Greek |
| Leyenda del reverso | ΛΥ ΣΙ |
| Canto | |
| Casa de moneda | |
| Tirada |
ND (225 BC - 198 BC) - - |
| ID de Numisquare | 7565049150 |
| Información adicional |
Historical Context: Lysimacheia, a pivotal Hellenistic city in Thrace, issued this Æ15 between 225 and 198 BC. This era was characterized by intense geopolitical flux following the Diadochi wars, with various powers—including the Seleucids, Aetolians, and Macedonians under Philip V—vying for control over strategic regions like the Hellespont. The city’s coinage during this period often reflects its intermittent autonomy or periods of external influence, serving as a vital economic tool for local commerce amidst broader regional conflicts and shifting alliances.
Artistry: Artistry on these small bronze denominations from Lysimacheia typically adheres to the broader Hellenistic stylistic conventions, even if executed by local die-engravers. While specific engravers remain anonymous, the designs, often depicting civic deities, mythological figures, or local symbols, would have been rendered with a characteristic blend of classical idealism and Hellenistic naturalism. Given the small flan (15mm), the iconography would have been concise, prioritizing recognizable attributes and profiles over intricate detail, reflecting a functional yet aesthetically informed approach to coinage.
Technical/Grading: This Æ15, weighing 2.16 grams, exhibits typical technical characteristics for Hellenistic bronze issues of its size. High-points for preservation would generally include the most prominent features of the obverse portrait (e.g., hair, nose, chin) and any central elements of the reverse design. Strike quality often varies; minor flan irregularities, off-centering, and areas of flatness are common due to the rapid production of utilitarian bronze currency. Full legends are frequently absent or weakly struck, and die wear is often evident, impacting the overall sharpness and detail.