Catalogus
| Uitgever | Andros |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 300 BC - 100 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | |
| Valuta | Drachm |
| Samenstelling | Bronze |
| Gewicht | 3.52 g |
| Diameter | 15.0 mm |
| Dikte | |
| Vorm | Round (irregular) |
| Techniek | Hammered |
| Oriëntatie | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| In omloop tot | |
| Referentie(s) |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Young head of Dionysus facing right, wearing wreath of ivy |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | |
| Opschrift voorzijde | |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Kantharos |
| Schrift keerzijde | |
| Opschrift keerzijde | |
| Rand | |
| Muntplaats | |
| Oplage |
ND (300 BC - 100 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 3102757800 |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Historical Context: This Æ15 bronze coin originates from Andros, a significant island in the Cyclades, during the Hellenistic period (300 BC - 100 BC). This era saw Andros navigate the shifting power dynamics between various Hellenistic kingdoms, including Macedonian, Ptolemaic, and Rhodian influences, before eventual Roman dominance. As a local bronze issue, it served as essential small change for daily transactions within the island's economy, underscoring Andros's continued civic autonomy and economic activity amidst broader geopolitical changes.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, this coin exemplifies the Hellenistic stylistic school, characterized by a blend of idealized forms and increased naturalism. Andrian coinage frequently features Dionysus, reflecting the island's renowned wine production. The obverse likely depicts a youthful head of Dionysus, often wreathed in ivy, rendered with flowing hair and expressive features. The reverse would typically present an attribute such as a kantharos or thyrsus, emblematic of the god and the island's agricultural wealth.
Technical/Grading: With a diameter of 15.0 mm and weighing 3.52 gg, this bronze issue exhibits typical Hellenistic fabric. High-points susceptible to wear include the hair and facial contours of the obverse deity, and the central elements of the reverse device. Technical strike qualities often vary; common observations include irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and potential for die wear, which can result in weaker details. Bronze compositions of this period are also prone to surface pitting or patination, affecting overall preservation.