Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Gallia Belgica tribes |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 125 BC - 100 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A highly abstracted Celticized horse galloping to the right, its body and limbs fragmented into a dynamic arrangement of curvilinear and pellet-form elements characteristic of late La Tène die-cutting. Above the horse, a stylized representation of a charioteer or driver figure is rendered as a series of disconnected geometric and organic shapes. Below the horse, a floral or rosette symbol occupies the lower field, serving as a decorative anchor to the composition. The entire design is uninscribed and executed with bold, confident relief on the irregular hammered flan. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (125 BC - 100 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The quarter stater format in Belgic Gaul emerged as tribes adapted and fragmented the Macedonian gold stater tradition filtering north and west through trade and mercenary contact — Philip II's coinage was the template, progressively abstracted over generations until the original portrait dissolved into the stylized forms characteristic of these issues. Attribution to a specific tribe remains impossible; the reference clustering across Scheers, Van Arsdell, and Delestrée reflects decades of academic disagreement rather than settled scholarship.