Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Gallia Belgica tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 125 BC - 100 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A highly abstracted Celticized horse galloping to the right, its body and limbs fragmented into a dynamic arrangement of curvilinear and pellet-form elements characteristic of late La Tène die-cutting. Above the horse, a stylized representation of a charioteer or driver figure is rendered as a series of disconnected geometric and organic shapes. Below the horse, a floral or rosette symbol occupies the lower field, serving as a decorative anchor to the composition. The entire design is uninscribed and executed with bold, confident relief on the irregular hammered flan. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (125 BC - 100 BC) |
| Additional information |
The quarter stater format in Belgic Gaul emerged as tribes adapted and fragmented the Macedonian gold stater tradition filtering north and west through trade and mercenary contact — Philip II's coinage was the template, progressively abstracted over generations until the original portrait dissolved into the stylized forms characteristic of these issues. Attribution to a specific tribe remains impossible; the reference clustering across Scheers, Van Arsdell, and Delestrée reflects decades of academic disagreement rather than settled scholarship.