Catalogue
| Émetteur | Ausesken gens |
|---|---|
| Année | 150 BC - 100 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | |
| Devise | Unit (second half of the 2nd century BC) |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 3.25 g |
| Diamètre | 17.33 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | ACIP#1303, CNH#10 |
| Description de l’avers | Male head with mantle facing right, dolphin behind. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Front half of pegasus right. |
| Écriture du revers | Iberian (Levantine) |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (150 BC - 100 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5169201640 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This 1/4 Bronze Unit, issued by the Ausesken gens between 150 BC and 100 BC, reflects a pivotal era during the Roman conquest of Hispania. The Ausesken, likely a significant Iberian tribe or family, maintained the right to mint their own currency, signifying local autonomy despite growing Roman influence. These fractional bronzes were essential for daily commerce, underscoring the economic self-sufficiency of native communities amidst the Celtiberian Wars and Roman consolidation.
Artistry: The engraver, typical for ancient provincial issues, is unknown. The coin's design aligns with the robust Iberian numismatic tradition, often showing Hellenistic influences filtered through Roman contact. Common motifs for such bronzes include a male head, perhaps a local hero or deity, on the obverse, rendered with a characteristic bold style. The reverse often features an animal or an Iberian horseman, emblematic of local identity. Execution prioritizes symbolic clarity over intricate detail.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 3.25 gram, 17.33 millimeter bronze flan, this unit embodies the practical nature of Iberian fractional coinage. High-points for wear are typically the prominent features of the obverse portrait or the musculature of any reverse animal. Technical strike quality varies; examples may show minor off-centering, uneven flans, or areas of weakness, common for issues produced under less centralized minting conditions. Nonetheless, the bronze composition ensures a durable and often well-preserved artifact.