| 発行体 | Antipolis |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 44 BC - 43 BC |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | |
| 通貨 | |
| 材質 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 2.93 g |
| 直径 | 13 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | I#532j , DICOMON 2#ANT-7 |
| 表面の説明 | Diademed head of Venus right. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 表面の銘文 | ΕΥ ΙΣ |
| 裏面の説明 | Nike crowning a trophy. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 裏面の銘文 |
ΑΝΤΙΠ ΛΕΠΙ (Translation: Antipolis Lepidus) |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (44 BC - 43 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1614069210 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This Æ13 coin, issued by Antipolis between 44 and 43 BC, places it squarely within the tumultuous period immediately following Julius Caesar's assassination. Antipolis, a Greek city in Gallia Narbonensis, navigated a complex political landscape under Roman hegemony. The magistrates ΕΥ ΙΣ and ΑΝΤΙΠ ΛΕΠΙ, whose names adorn this bronze, represent the continuity of local civic administration and the city's prerogative to mint coinage, even as the wider Roman world descended into civil war. This issuance underscores the enduring local autonomy and economic self-sufficiency of provincial cities during times of imperial instability.
Artistry: While specific engraver details are lost to history, this coin exemplifies the Hellenistic provincial style, adapting Greek artistic traditions to local sensibilities and Roman influence. Given its small 13mm flan, the design would have been compact, likely featuring a civic emblem, a local deity, or a magistrate's symbol, typical of bronzes from this era. The legends ΕΥ ΙΣ and ΑΝΤΙΠ ΛΕΠΙ, identifying the issuing magistrates, would have been skillfully incorporated into the limited space, demonstrating the mint's capacity for clear, if miniature, epigraphy.
Technical/Grading: As a small bronze coin, the strike quality of this Æ13 piece can vary significantly. High-points of the design, such as facial features or intricate details of an emblem, are often susceptible to weak striking or wear. Typical technical aspects for evaluation include the centering of the strike, the evenness of the flan, and the sharpness of the legends. Irregularly shaped flans and minor off-strikes are common, reflecting the expediency of production for such fractional denominations, intended for daily local commerce rather than grand imperial statement.