Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Kefra |
|---|---|
| Năm | 300 BC - 241 BC |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | |
| Tiền tệ | Litra |
| Chất liệu | Bronze |
| Trọng lượng | 1.52 g |
| Đường kính | 12.0 mm |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | CNS#11, Jenkins P1#23 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Head of Herakles right, wearing lion`s skin |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Fish facing right |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (300 BC - 241 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 7823666050 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This Æ12, issued by Kefra between 300 BC and 241 BC, belongs to the dynamic Hellenistic period. During this era of evolving political landscapes, bronze coinage was indispensable for everyday commerce. Kefra, as an issuing authority, likely represented a significant regional power or city-state, asserting its economic stability and sovereign identity through its currency. The consistent issuance of small denominations like the Æ12 underscores a robust local economy's need for fractional currency, reflecting Kefra's administrative capacity.
Artistry: The design of this Æ12, constrained by its diminutive 12.0 mm flan, adhered to prevailing Hellenistic artistic conventions. Though the engraver is anonymous, the stylistic school emphasized clarity and symbolic representation. Common designs featured a laureate or diademed head of a local deity or deified ruler on the obverse, rendered with idealized realism. The reverse typically bore an emblematic device—an animal, cornucopia, or civic symbol—serving as a clear identifier for Kefra and reflecting the period's aesthetic tastes.
Technical/Grading: With a weight of 1.52 grams and 12.0 mm diameter, this Æ12 often shows challenges inherent in striking small bronze coinage. Key high-points susceptible to wear or weak strike include a portrait's hair, cheekbone, or fine details of a reverse emblem. Technical strike qualities vary; examples range from well-centered, fully struck pieces to those with minor off-centering, planchet irregularities, or flatness from insufficient striking pressure. The bronze alloy can also present surface issues like pitting or corrosion, critical factors in assessing overall condition and grade.