Catalogue
| Émetteur | Sestos |
|---|---|
| Année | 300 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | |
| Devise | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 1.82 g |
| Diamètre | 12.0 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | BMC Greek#8 var. |
| Description de l’avers | Head of female left, hair in sphendone |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Herm with a grain ear to the right |
| Écriture du revers | Greek |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (-300) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4486126260 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: Sestos, a vital city on the Hellespont, issued this Æ12 around 300 BC, a period of intense geopolitical flux following Alexander's death. This early Hellenistic era saw the rise of the Diadochi, with Lysimachus consolidating power in Thrace. Strategically crucial for controlling maritime trade, Sestos experienced fluctuating autonomy. This bronze denomination served essential local economic functions, facilitating daily commerce amidst larger silver issues, reflecting the city's enduring civic identity and practical needs.
Artistry: The specific engraver of this small bronze piece is unknown, typical for such civic issues. Its design would have adhered to prevailing Late Classical/Early Hellenistic Greek stylistic traditions, blending idealized forms with a burgeoning realism, though executed by local workshops. Sestos's coinage frequently featured local deities or civic symbols reflecting its maritime importance or agricultural wealth. Common motifs might include heads of gods or symbols like a caduceus or corn ear, rendered with a direct aesthetic suited to the small flan.
Technical/Grading: This Æ12, weighing 1.82 grams and measuring 12.0 mm, is a modest bronze issue. Its small module often results in variable strike quality, common for ancient bronzes. High-points of the design, such as hair details on a portrait or raised elements of a reverse device, would be the first to show wear. Technically, these coins frequently exhibit minor off-centering, irregular flan shapes, and occasional die flaws. Inconsistent strike pressure could lead to weaker areas, though a well-centered example with clear devices is highly desirable.