Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Seðlabanki Íslands (Central Bank of Iceland) |
|---|---|
| Year | 2004-2009 |
| Type | Standard circulation banknote |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | SAMKVÆMT LÖGUM NR.36 22. MAÍ 2001 SEÐLABANKI ÍSLANDS EITT ÞÚSUND KRÓNUR (Translation: IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW NO.36 22nd MAY 2001 CENTRAL BANK OF ICELAND ONE THOUSAND KRONUR (CROWNS)) |
| Reverse description | Yellow, brown, and purple multicolour print. The central vignette presents a side view of Skálholt Cathedral as it appeared in the 17th century, with ecclesiastical decorative elements rendered in the background. The numeral denomination appears to the right. |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
The "no top and bottom border" designation refers to a deliberate design revision made to the 1000 Krónur series during this period — the earlier bordered version (P#58) had been in circulation since 2001, and the stripped border variant introduced a cleaner edge treatment that became the definitive format for the remaining print runs through 2009. Thomas De La Rue produced both variants from London, making the visual difference between them the primary distinguishing factor for collectors working without reference numbers.
Iceland's relatively small circulation volumes mean surviving examples from specific print years within the 2004–2009 window are not always easy to attribute precisely by date.