Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1000 Krónur Law of 1961

Uitgever Seðlabanki Íslands (Central Bank of Iceland)
Jaar 1981-1986
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta New króna (1980-date)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Yellow, brown, and purple multicolour underprint with guilloche patterning. A half-length portrait vignette of Bishop Brynjólfur Sveinsson (1605–1675) occupies the right portion of the note, rendered in intaglio. The issuing authority inscription and denomination are printed in the upper and lower registers, with the bishop's name and life dates integrated into the design below the portrait.
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Portrait watermark of Jón Sigurðsson
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

Pick 52 was issued under the Law of 1961 but didn't enter circulation until the 1980s — a gap that reflects how slowly Seðlabanki Íslands refreshed its higher denominations during that period. The 1000 krónur was a substantial sum in Iceland at the time, and the denomination circulated alongside a monetary system that would be overhauled entirely in 1981, when Iceland redenominated at 100:1, introducing the new króna. That reform makes the dating of individual notes within the 1981–1986 window significant: earlier printings predate the redenomination, later ones postdate it.

Bradbury Wilkinson and De La Rue both appear in the printer record, suggesting production shifted between the two firms across the issue's lifespan — not unusual for a long-running series.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT