See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

100 Yuan Magpies Painting

Issuer People's Bank of China
Year 1994
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) KM#672
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering 中华人民共和国
1994
中国人民银行
Reverse description The reverse depicts two magpies rendered in a classical Chinese painting style, perched and in motion among flowering plum branches against a plain polished field. The composition evokes the traditional ink-wash painting aesthetic, with fine incised detail on the birds' plumage and the gnarled branches. A vertical inscription in Chinese characters appears to the upper right of the design. The denomination 100元 is inscribed in the lower field in a combination of Arabic numerals and Chinese characters.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Magpies series occupied an odd corner of China's gold bullion program in the 1990s — positioned neither as a pure investment piece nor as a fully committed commemorative, it attracted collectors drawn to traditional ink-wash imagery at a time when the Panda series dominated international attention. The 1994 issue drew from a long pictorial tradition associating magpies with good fortune, a theme with obvious commercial appeal in export markets, particularly Hong Kong and overseas Chinese communities.

Mintage figures for this type were modest and have never been authoritatively consolidated in Western references, which partly explains the persistent gaps in KM pricing data.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE