See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

100 Francs - Louis Philippe Pattern

Issuer Monnaie de Paris
Year 1831
Type Log in to see details
Value 100 Francs
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central field bears the denomination 100 FRANCS and date 1831 inscribed in three lines, all enclosed within a wreath formed by two symmetrical laurel-and-olive branches tied at the base with a ribbon bow. The branches are rendered with careful botanical detail, their leaves and berries finely modelled in high relief. The composition is centred on the plain field with no exergual line, and the wreath tips nearly meet at the top of the coin. The rim is defined by a continuous beaded border.
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The July Monarchy's early coinage program required new dies across multiple denominations, and trial strikes in tin were a routine part of the Monnaie de Paris approval process — allowing engravers and officials to assess relief and lettering before committing to gold production. This particular essai precedes the circulating 100 Francs gold coinage that would follow once the new regime had stabilized its political footing after the upheaval of 1830.

Mazur 1058 and Gadoury 1128 both treat this as a pattern proper rather than a simple die trial, suggesting it saw at least limited formal review.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE