Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Royal Thai Mint |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1997 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | 3 mm |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Uncrowned effigy of King Bhumibol Adulyadej (Rama IX) in left-facing profile, depicted wearing spectacles and a suit with necktie, rendered in high relief against a mirror-polished field. The Thai legend reading 'รัชกาลที่ ๙' (Rama IX) appears along the left rim, with 'ประเทศไทย' (Thailand) along the right rim. The denomination '๑๐๐ บาท' (100 Baht) is inscribed along the lower portion of the coin. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Reeded |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Issued as part of Thailand's participation in the CITES-linked conservation coin programs that proliferated across Southeast Asia in the mid-1990s, this piece was produced during a period when the Royal Thai Mint was aggressively expanding its commemorative output — often in coordination with international wildlife bodies pushing member states to fund enforcement through collector coinage. Mintages for this series were kept deliberately low to sustain secondary market demand, a policy that sometimes left the conservation programs themselves underfunded relative to the promotional apparatus surrounding them.