Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Reserve Bank of India |
|---|---|
| Year | 2016 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Devanagari, Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
India's ₹10 bimetallic coin has had a troubled public life — widespread rumors circulating from around 2016 onward convinced large segments of the population that many varieties were fake, leading shopkeepers across multiple states to refuse the coins outright. The Reserve Bank of India issued repeated clarifications, but the rejections persisted for years. Experimental copper-nickel strikes like this piece were almost certainly produced to evaluate alloy alternatives amid ongoing concerns about production costs and the public confusion surrounding the bimetallic series.