Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Transnistria |
|---|---|
| Year | 1994 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 10 Roubles (10 рубле́й) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Portrait of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870–1924) at right, the National Emblem of the Soviet Union in the upper left corner, and an adhesive validation stamp bearing the effigy of General Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov affixed at the far right. The note is based on the 1961 Soviet State Bank issue, with the Transnistrian stamp applied as an overprint to authorize its circulation. Guilloche underprint in multicolor tones frames the central vignette. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | СССР ДЕСЯТЬ РУБЛЕЙ ПОДДЕЛКА БИЛЕТОВ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО БАНКА СССР ПРЕСЛЕДУЕТСЯ ПО ЗАКОНУ ДЕСЯТЬ КАРБОВАНЦІВ•ДЗЕСЯЦЬ РУБЛЁЎ ЎН СЎМ•ОН СОМ•ათი მანეთი ОН МАНАТ•DEŠIMT RUBLIŲ•ЗЕЧЕ РУБЛЕ DESMIT RUBĻU•ОН СОМ•ДАҲ СЎМ•ՏԱՍ ՌՈՒԲԼԻ•ОН МАНАТ•KÜMME RUBLA (Translation: USSR TEN ROUBLES COUNTERFEITING NOTES OF THE STATE BANK OF THE USSR IS PUNISHABLE BY LAW TEN ROUBLES [in all official languages of the USSR]) |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Transnistria's first rouble series, introduced after the breakaway republic declared independence from Moldova in 1990, was produced under extremely constrained circumstances. The printing date of 30 April 1994 — formatted in the local convention as 30.04.1945, which has caused persistent misreading among collectors — places these notes squarely in the chaotic early period when the unrecognised state was simultaneously fighting for survival and building financial infrastructure from scratch.
No major security printing house was involved. The notes are notoriously crude by contemporary standards, and early issues suffered from poor ink adhesion.