See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

10 Réis - Maria I Large Type, Low and High Crowns, Lisbon Mint

Issuer Casa da Moeda de Lisboa
Year 1786-1796
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage 1786 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.01 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 425,421
1786 - KM #215.2; Bentes #306.01-02 (High Crown); (See Comments). -
1787 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.02 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 313,540
1787 - KM #215.2; Bentes #306.03-04 (High Crown); (See Comments). -
1790 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.03-04 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 379,028
1790 - KM #215.2; Bentes #306.01-05 (High Crown); (See Comments). -
1796 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.05 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 260,227
Additional information

Maria I's copper coinage of the late 1780s and 1790s was minted under considerable fiscal strain — Portugal's metropolitan economy was heavily dependent on Brazilian gold remittances that had been declining since mid-century, leaving the crown increasingly reliant on token copper issues to service everyday transactions. The "Low Crown" and "High Crown" varieties catalogued under Bentes 305 and 306 reflect successive punch modifications at the Lisbon mint, likely made between die marriages rather than as any deliberate policy change.

Neither variety commands a significant premium over the other in circulated grades, but the distinction matters to type collectors working the series in full.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE