Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Casa da Moeda de Lisboa |
|---|---|
| Year | 1786-1796 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1786 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.01 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 425,421 1786 - KM #215.2; Bentes #306.01-02 (High Crown); (See Comments). - 1787 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.02 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 313,540 1787 - KM #215.2; Bentes #306.03-04 (High Crown); (See Comments). - 1790 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.03-04 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 379,028 1790 - KM #215.2; Bentes #306.01-05 (High Crown); (See Comments). - 1796 - KM #215.1; Bentes #305.05 (Low Crown); (See Comments). - 260,227 |
| Additional information |
Maria I's copper coinage of the late 1780s and 1790s was minted under considerable fiscal strain — Portugal's metropolitan economy was heavily dependent on Brazilian gold remittances that had been declining since mid-century, leaving the crown increasingly reliant on token copper issues to service everyday transactions. The "Low Crown" and "High Crown" varieties catalogued under Bentes 305 and 306 reflect successive punch modifications at the Lisbon mint, likely made between die marriages rather than as any deliberate policy change.
Neither variety commands a significant premium over the other in circulated grades, but the distinction matters to type collectors working the series in full.