See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

10 Đồng PoW camps

Issuer National Bank of Vietnam (Ngân-hàng Quốc-gia Việt-Nam)
Year 1955
Type Vouchers
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering NGÂN-HÀNG QUỐC-GIA VIỆT-NAM
MƯỜI ĐỒNG
10
THỦ-QUỸ TRUNG ƯƠNG
TỔNG-KIỂM-TRA
VIỆT-NAM
PHIEU TU BINH
CHI NHÁNH SAIGON
VIỆT - NAM CỘNG HOÀ
(Translation: National Bank of the State of Vietnam. Ten đồng. Central Cashier. Chief Inspector. Vietnam. POW Voucher, Saigon Branch, Republic of Vietnam.)
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering 10
VIỆT-NAM
HÌNH LUẬT PHẠT KHỔ-SAI NHỮNG KẺ LÀM GIẢ MẠO GIẤY BẠC DO NGÂN-HÀNG QUỐC-GIA VIỆT-NAM PHÁT RA
MƯỜI ĐỒNG
SECURITY BANKNOTE COMPANY
(Translation: Vietnam. Criminal law sentences one to penal labour for counterfeiting paper money issued by the National Bank of the State of Vietnam. Ten đồng.)
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

These notes were specifically printed for use in prisoner-of-war camps during the 1954–1955 population transfer that followed the Geneva Accords — the massive northward and southward movement of civilians and military personnel after partition. Distinct from the general circulation series, camp currency was designed to function within a controlled environment where standard notes could not be permitted to accumulate freely or be carried out.

The SBNC attribution carries a question mark for good reason. Philadelphia printing is plausible given South Vietnam's early reliance on American security printing infrastructure, but documentation confirming this specific contract is not conclusive.