See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

10 Dollars

Issuer Chartered Mercantile Bank of India, London and China
Year 1883-1886
Type Standard circulation banknote
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering 10
INCORPORATED BY ROYAL CHARTER
SINGAPORE
3rd Jan 1883
THE CHARTERED MERCANTILE BANK OF INDIA, LONDON & CHINA
Promises to pay the Bearer on Demand
at its Branch in SINGAPORE in Local Currency,
the sum of TEN DOLLARS Value received.
By order of the Court of Directors
Reverse description Blue print on plain paper. The reverse is dominated by a large central guilloche rosette of concentric lathe-work ovals, flanked symmetrically by four smaller circular guilloche medallions, each bearing the numeral "10". A pale red underprint band runs horizontally across the centre.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

The Chartered Mercantile Bank of India, London and China was one of the major British exchange banks operating across Asia in the nineteenth century, issuing notes that functioned primarily as instruments of trade finance rather than everyday currency. Its Hong Kong dollar notes circulated alongside those of the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation and the Oriental Bank — a crowded field that only the strongest institutions survived.

The Mercantile Bank did not survive intact. Severe losses in the mid-1880s forced a reconstruction in 1893, after which it was refloated as the Mercantile Bank of India. Notes from the 1883–1886 window predate that collapse and are rare partly because the bank's own difficulties disrupted normal record-keeping and redemption procedures.