See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Văn - Đại Định different character distribution, private issue?

Issuer Empire of Vietnam
Year 1140-1162
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Cast
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Four Chinese characters arranged around the central square hole in a cross configuration, reading 大定通寶 (Đại Định Thông Bảo). The characters are rendered in standard script (kaishu) within a raised circular border, with the character 大 positioned at the top, 定 to the right, 通 at the bottom, and 寶 to the left — a distribution noted as atypical from the standard reading order, suggesting a possible private or unofficial issue. The fields between the characters are plain. The coin displays the broad flat rim characteristic of Vietnamese cast cash coinage of the Lý dynasty period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1140-1162)
Additional information

The Đại Định reign of Lý Anh Tông spanned over two decades, long enough to produce considerable variation in cash coin production. The "different character distribution" designation flags an arrangement of the four reign-title characters that deviates from the standard rotational order — a phenomenon common in Vietnamese cash coinage where provincial or private casting introduced local idiosyncrasies. The "private issue?" qualifier reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty: Toda himself acknowledged that workshop attribution for Lý-dynasty cash remains unresolved, as both state foundries and licensed private casters operated concurrently, often using the same inscription with subtly different casting geometry.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE