See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Tremissis Torso with fifteen sections

Issuer Tuscany, Duchy of
Year 672-700
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round (irregular)
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A bold equal-armed cross occupies the central field, executed in the hammered style typical of late 7th-century Italian gold coinage. The cross is encircled by a degenerate circular legend composed of debased, nonsensical Latin-style letterforms, consistent with the imitative and increasingly abstract character of Tuscan tremisses of the period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering IVNOUVVNIIOUNI
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Struck in the Lombard duchy that controlled much of central Italy following the invasion of 568, these tremisses were issued under dukes who nominally acknowledged Lombard royal authority while operating with considerable independence. The "torso with fifteen sections" type belongs to a poorly understood sequence of late seventh-century pseudo-imperial gold that increasingly departed from Byzantine prototypes — the degradation of imagery was not incompetence but a deliberate, gradual assertion of local identity as Byzantine reconquest became a fading threat. MEC I places this firmly within the Lucca or Pisa mint horizon, though attribution remains contested.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE