See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Thaler - Leopold I St Veit

Issuer Imperial Mint, St. Veit
Year 1660-1670
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) KM#1176, Her#621-622, Dav EC II#3236
Obverse description Laureate and draped bust of Emperor Leopold I facing right, wearing a laurel wreath and elaborately decorated armour with a lace cravat. The emperor's distinctive features, including his prominent jaw and long flowing hair, are rendered in fine relief in the baroque style. A beaded inner border frames the design. The Latin legend reads LEOPOLDVS D G ROM IMP S A G H ET B REX, distributed around the periphery.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering LEOPOLDVS D G ROM IM S A G H E B REX
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

St. Veit am Pflaum — now Rijeka, Croatia — operated as an Imperial mint intermittently through the seventeenth century, and its output is consistently underrepresented in major collections. Leopold I's early reign saw Thalers struck there during the protracted aftermath of the Thirty Years' War, when Habsburg finances were under severe strain from Ottoman pressure in the east and ongoing costs of garrisoning the Military Frontier. The St. Veit facility was never a high-volume operation, which accounts for the relative difficulty of locating well-attributed examples today.

Davenport's EC II attribution places this squarely within the broader Austrian Thaler sequence, but Herinek's tighter die distinctions at 621–622 separate what are otherwise superficially similar issues.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE