See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Thaler - George William

Issuer Brandenburg-Prussia, State of
Year 1635-1639
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Large multi-quartered coat of arms of the Brandenburg-Hohenzollern dynasty, surmounted by an electoral crown, displaying the heraldic emblems of the various territories held by the Elector, including the Brandenburgian eagle, the Prussian eagle, and other dynastic quarterings. The shield is ornately framed and fills the majority of the reverse field. The mint-master's initials DK (for Daniel Kastenholz) appear within the field flanking the shield. The circular Latin legend surrounding the arms reads MONITA NOVA ARGENTEA DVCIS PRVSSIÆ DK, translating as 'New silver coinage of the Duke of Prussia,' with the date partially visible at the top of the coin above the crown.
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

George William's final years as Elector were among the most catastrophic in Brandenburg's history — his indecision during the Thirty Years' War left his territories repeatedly occupied, looted, and depopulated by both Swedish and Imperial forces. These thalers were struck during that terminal phase of his reign, when the Brandenburg mint was functioning under conditions of near-constant military disruption. That the Marienburg collection catalogued a specimen at all speaks to how few survived institutional dispersal.

The Dav ST#6151 attribution places this within the Stolberg die study, a useful anchor given the overlapping emission dates and the difficulty of pinning individual strikes to a single mint year within the 1635–1639 window.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE